Archive

Archive for the ‘Social Life’ Category

What It’s Like to Fail

November 19, 2013 Leave a comment

david_suit_edited

On Christmas Day, 2001, I sat down at my Yamaha G2 grand piano, set up my metronome, and opened up a book of Shostakovich’s “Preludes.” It was late afternoon, and the warm, orange light of the fading day poured into my five-bedroom house — paid for by my $300,000 a year income as a Hollywood comedy writer — in San Marino, California, a wealthy suburb of Los Angeles. My wife, Marina, was cooking dinner for me and our eight children, and it was as happy a Christmas afternoon as I would ever have. Read More

Advertisements

BBC News – Azhar Ahmed convicted of offensive Facebook message

September 20, 2012 Leave a comment

Dual and ugly face of Western media and law.

BBC News – Azhar Ahmed convicted of offensive Facebook message.

Isn’t it really pathetic??

A spicy menage …

August 17, 2012 Leave a comment

A spicy menage a trois: The shocking love triangle between Lord Mountbatten, his wife and the founder of modern India

By GLENYS ROBERTS

‘At the stroke of the midnight hour when the world sleeps, India will awake to life and freedom.’

Those powerful words, memorable to everyone who loves India, were uttered by the father of the modern nation, Jawaharlal Nehru, when the country became independent more than 60 years ago.

Behind this famous ‘tryst with destiny’ speech lay a deeply personal fight to escape the domination of the British Raj, a struggle all the more meaningful because of Nehru’s private life.

Special relationship: Lord and Lady Mountbatten with Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru Special relationship: Lord and Lady Mountbatten with Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru

For the handsome widower had formed a more than usually deep bond with, of all people, the beautiful wife of the chief representative of the occupying power, Edwina, Lady Mountbatten.

If you came across their romance in a novel, you would dismiss it instantly as fiction.

But the fact is the couple shared an extraordinary love. Their deep attachment lasted from the moment they met in 1947 in New Delhi until the day Edwina died 13 years later.

It was such a meaningful relationship that even Lord Mountbatten himself found it best to turn a blind eye.

Perhaps he even encouraged it, so that he could benefit from any insight into the Indian mind that his wife could pass him at this pivotal time in their history.

This fascinating personal intrigue was to have been the basis of a new film, Indian Summer, starring Hugh Grant and Cate Blanchett as Lord and Lady Mountbatten.

As for the handsome Nehru, rumour has it he was to be played by Irrfan Khan, star of the hugely successful Slumdog Millionaire.

‘Dickie was devoted to Edwina, but awkward in bed’

But so concerned are the Indian government to protect their favourite statesman’s reputation that, after nine months of costly pre-production in Delhi, filming has been dramatically ordered to cease.

Indian politicians have demanded to see the script to know just how explicitly the relationship will be portrayed.

Hitherto, those who know the truth about the relationship between Nehru and Lady Mountbatten (including Mountbatten’s two daughters) have always insisted the couple never consummated their great love, and that it was more spiritual than physical.

But what is the real story? Certainly, there are aspects of Lady Mountbatten’s early life that will shock India’s ruling elite, who even today do not allow their Bollywood stars to kiss on screen.

The spoiled favourite granddaughter of a Jewish financier close to the royals, Edwina Ashley was the richest and most glamorous deb of her time.

In 1922, she married the handsome, though impoverished, 21-year- old Lord Louis Mountbatten. Known in the family as ‘Dickie’, he is nowadays best remembered as Prince Charles’s great-uncle and mentor, tragically killed by an IRA bomb in 1979.

Ostensibly it was the perfect match, but the sexually inexperienced couple had little in common.

Perfect match? Lord Mountbatten and Edwina Mountbatten were married in 1922 but had little in commonPerfect match? Lord Mountbatten and Edwina Mountbatten were married in 1922 but had little in common

After a fumbling honeymoon, some of it spent in Hollywood, Mountbatten resumed his career as a naval officer.

Meanwhile, the stylish Edwina, described as one of the six best- dressed women in the world, shopped at Chanel, played bridge, and danced the Charleston until 3am, sometimes with Fred Astaire.

At weekends, their country home was full of guests (including the Prince of Wales) arriving in fast cars and even aeroplanes.

Vain, charming and boyish, Dickie was devoted to Edwina, but still awkward in bed. He famously named her breasts Mutt and Jeff – the nicknames that World War I soldiers gave their campaign medals.

To him, sex was unromantic, ‘a mixture of psychology and hydraulics’. There were also mutterings that he preferred men.

Things went downhill after their daughter Patricia was born in 1924.

While Mountbatten doted on the new arrival, the passionate Edwina was pathologically jealous of her own child being the centre of attention.

‘A divine little daughter. Too thrilling, too sweet,’ she trilled to her diary  –  but then packed the baby off to nannies on the South Coast. The highly sexed Edwina then proceeded to look for lovers from all walks of life.

Nehru, like both Mountbattens, had bisexual tendencies

Her first was the aristocratic Lord Molyneux. He was followed by a rich, polo-playing American, Laddie Sandford, and then by Mike Wardell, the good-looking manager of a London evening newspaper. At times, she juggled all three at once.

‘Lord Molyneux is in the morning-room and Mr Sandford in the library, but where should I put the other gentleman?’ asked a desperate flunkey when they happened to visit together.

While her husband was posted to Malta in the early Thirties, she turned to American golf champion Bobby Sweeny.

Next came playboy Larry Gray, before she went on a Mexican cruise and jumped into bed with the elder of two Californian brothers, Ted Phillips, quickly followed by his sibling Bunny.

This serial sexual gallivanting went on until the birth of her second daughter Pamela in 1929.

By now, Mountbatten, too, was seeking other women. In 1931, he was flirting with the 18-year-old future Duchess of Argyll and even kept her photo in his cabin.

‘The only photo of any girl!’ he wrote to her. Later, there was Barbara Cartland and the Frenchwoman Yola Letellier, on whom Colette based her novel Gigi. Edwina was fiercely jealous, but she didn’t think to change her own habits.

Throughout the Thirties, she had dozens of admirers, known in the private slang of the Mountbatten circle as ‘ginks’.

As Mountbatten himself once put it: ‘Edwina and I spent all our married lives getting into other people’s beds.’

She even dallied with conductor Malcolm Sargent, and then embarked on her most adventurous affair to date, with the bisexual West Indian cabaret pianist Leslie Hutchinson.

Forbidden love: Edwina and Nehru in the Moghul Gardens of the Viceroy house during celebrations to mark the 10th anniversary of the Republic of India in 1960Forbidden love: Edwina and Nehru in the Moghul Gardens of the Viceroy house during celebrations to mark the 10th anniversary of the Republic of India in 1960

Although Edwina successfully sued a newspaper for saying she had a black lover, there is not much doubt she conducted an on-off relationship with ‘Hutch’ for 30 years.

She famously gave him a gold bracelet bearing her name, a gold cigarette case and, conclusively perhaps, a jewelled penis sheath from Cartier.

This sexual track record seems like an unlikely apprenticeship for a woman to become the great love of the socialist founder of modern India.

But Edwina, the social butterfly, also had a strong streak of idealism. Never one for empty titles, she seems to have climbed in and out of bed looking for a cause.

With the onset of World War II, her tireless work in the bombed- out East End was followed by a spell in South-East Asia repatriating British refugees from prison camps and hospitals.

Not for nothing did the blood of her great-great-grandfather, the distinguished 19th-century reformer Lord Shaftesbury, run in her veins.

Mountbatten’s war service culminated, of course, in the recapture of Burma from the Japanese.

Beside her bed was a collection of his letters

Indeed, both had such a successful war that in 1947 they were posted by the new Labour Prime Minister Clement Attlee to Delhi, as the last Viceroy and Vicereine of India to facilitate the smooth transition of power to Nehru, the country’s nationalist leader.

While the young Edwina had been playing the field, the patrician Nehru had been working hard for his country.

Born in 1889, son of a leading lawyer, he came from a rich and influential family with distinctly Anglicised tastes in clothes and culture.

The boys were educated in England and the girls had English governesses who gave the children English names. Jawaharlal became ‘Joe’, his sisters ‘Nan’ and ‘Betty’. After Harrow and Cambridge, Jawaharlal was called to the Bar in London, but he soon returned to India.

In 1916, he had married the high-born Kamala, riding to his Maharajah-style wedding in Delhi on a white horse.

But he had already come under the spell of the charismatic Gandhi, at the time a failed lawyer who, having been shabbily treated in British-owned South Africa, returned to his own country fired up against social injustice and determined to free it from foreign domination.

Nehru sympathised with Gandhi’s non-violent philosophy. At home, meanwhile, his frail wife started her own radical crusade to improve women’s rights.

Interestingly, the Nehru marriage somewhat mirrored that of the Mountbattens. In her 30s Kamala developed into an irresistibly attractive woman who was always surrounded by infatuated young men, including Feroze Gandhi (no relation to the Mahatma), the future husband of her daughter, Indira, who would of course later became the country’s fiery leader.

Many people are convinced Kamala and Feroze conducted a long and satisfying affair.

However, Kamala died at a young age of tuberculosis in 1936. And though Nehru had also had affairs, he never remarried. His only love now was his country – until he met Edwina Mountbatten.

It wasn’t Edwina’s first visit to India – she had engineered an invitation to the Viceregal Lodge before her marriage in hot pursuit of Mountbatten, who was also staying there.

Neither was it the first time she had met Nehru. She and Dickie had warmed to the man, whose aquiline features resembled Mountbatten’s own, in Singapore in 1946.

Those close to the couple insisted they never consummated their great love, and that it was more spiritual than physicalDeep attachment: Those close to the couple insisted they never consummated their great love, and that it was more spiritual than physical

Now, with Nehru’s mission to liberate his country at a time when war-weary Britain was desperate to get rid of it, the 47-year-old Edwina finally had a focus for her huge energy and political radicalism. Of course, British withdrawal did not go as smoothly as everyone hoped.

Mass migration and massacres followed as Indians fought for territory with the new Pakistan.

In this sensitive climate, Edwina put herself at great personal risk as she and Nehru tried to stop the looting and mob violence.

Working alongside him in hospitals and refugee camps, she was fearless. At one Muslim refugee camp, she found a gang of Hindus and Sikhs trying to set it on fire and kill the inmates.

Edwina stood in front of the crowd as calmly as though she were at a garden party, threatening to have her guards shoot the agitators. Improbably they backed off in the face of her natural authority.

After independence, the Indophile Mountbattens made many visits to the country, and Edwina spent more and more time with the new prime minister Nehru.

This is the point at which her younger daughter Pamela, the biographer in the family, acknowledges that love blossomed between the lonely Nehru and the Vicereine.

What’s more, says Pamela, her father condoned the friendship, even going so far as to call it a ‘happy threesome’.

‘My mother had already had lovers. My father was inured to it. It broke his heart the first time, but it was somehow different with Nehru,’ she has written.

When parted, they wrote to each other constantly – and Edwina made no attempt to keep the letters secret from her husband 

As Mountbatten himself wrote to her sister Patricia at the time: ‘She and Jawaharlal (Nehru) are so sweet together, they really dote on each other.’

Undignifed as it seems against the backdrop of the huge historic events in which they were caught up, there are those who suspect that Nehru, like both Mountbattens, had bisexual tendencies, and that Dickie, in a last attempt to establish physical intimacy with his unresponsive wife, may have joined them in a physical menage a trois.

Whatever went on in the bedroom, the Mountbattens joined Nehru in a very public romance with India.

This, though, didn’t go down well back in Britain, where disapproval came to a head after Gandhi was assassinated in 1948.

Seeing a newspaper photo of the grieving Viceregal couple squatting on the ground at Gandhi’s cremation, Churchill angrily concluded that they had gone native, disgracing themselves as royal representatives. When they returned home, the old war hero refused to shake Mountbatten’s hand.

The unconventional Lady Mountbatten, however, rose above all this. She visited Nehru every year and he (her soulmate) visited her in England, where his sister became High Commissioner.

When parted, they wrote to each other constantly – and Edwina made no attempt to keep the letters secret from her husband.

As she wrote to Dickie in 1952: ‘Some of them have no “personal” remarks at all. Others are love letters… though you yourself well realise the strange relationship  –  most of it spiritual  –  which exists between us.’

When the correspondence is eventually published in its entirety, perhaps we may know the whole truth.

Meanwhile, one of Nehru’s own last letters, written ten years after their first meeting, sheds a little more light. ‘Suddenly I realised (and perhaps you also did) that there was a deeper attachment between us, that some uncontrollable force, of which I was dimly aware, drew us to one another.

‘I was overwhelmed and at the same time exhilarated by this new discovery. We talked more intimately as if some veil had been removed and we could look into each other’s eyes without fear or embarrassment.’

Intense words, yet Nehru was now 68, his romantic friend ten years younger.

No longer in the first flush of youth, perhaps there was no great urgency to climb into bed.

Little did they realise how little time was left. A year later, in 1960, 58-year- old Edwina, by now leading a selfless life, died alone in her sleep while on a trip to Borneo on behalf of St John Ambulance Brigade. Beside her bed was her collection of Nehru’s letters.

And the love affair was not over yet. As her body was taken by the Royal Navy to its sea burial off Britain’s south coast, Prime Minister Nehru made his last and most public declaration of his devotion, sending his own Indian Navy frigate to cast a wreath into the waters on his behalf.

Such a dramatic farewell would make a stirring finale to any film. But as the director Joe Wright, who was behind the scheduled movie says, it will be a long time before it gets made, thanks to the explosive mixture of politics and forbidden love.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1216186/The-shocking-love-triangle-Lord-Mountbatten-wife-founder-modern-India.html#ixzz23mYj51GI

Visit me on facebook: http://www.facebook.com/ameerahmadmirza

Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/ameermirza2

Aao mil ker Akbar ko talaash kerain – Column by Ali Moeen Nawazish

August 13, 2012 Leave a comment

Image

Pakistan bans zakat, fitrana collection by militants

July 24, 2012 Leave a comment

By Zia Ur Rehman

 

KARACHI – The Pakistani government has imposed a nationwide ban on collection of zakat and fitrana donations of food aid by banned outfits during Ramadan, Rehman Malik, senior advisor to Prime Minister Raja Pervaiz Ashraf on interior affairs, said.

“Any social and welfare organisation willing to collect zakat and fitrana has to apply and acquire permission from the government; otherwise, no one will be allowed to indulge in these activities,” Malik said July 22.

“Directives have been issued to police and law enforcement agencies to keep an eye on fund-raising activities of banned militant outfits during Ramadan,” he said.

Banned extremist groups pose as charities to rake in millions of rupees that fund terrorism instead of helping the poor, charity activists say.

 

SOURCE:   http://centralasiaonline.com/en_GB/articles/caii/newsbriefs/2012/07/23/newsbrief-05

 

Visit me on facebook: http://www.facebook.com/ameerahmadmirza

Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/ameermirza2

During Ramadan, Pakistani militants collect money for terrorism

July 24, 2012 Leave a comment

Authorities take action, analysts say

By Zia Ur RehmanPrint

KARACHI – As the holy month of Ramadan begins, charitable fund-raising appeals are getting under way across Pakistan. But security analysts and social activists are concerned about terrorist groups posing as charities seeking to take advantage of zakat donations.
  • A Pakistani security officer seals the Karachi office of Jamaat-ud-Dawa in December 2008. Pakistan put the Islamist charity, regarded as a front for the Lashkar-e-Taiba group, under monitoring. As Ramadan begins, authorities are cracking down on militant groups who pose as charities but use the money to fund terrorism. [REUTERS/Athar Hussain]A Pakistani security officer seals the Karachi office of Jamaat-ud-Dawa in December 2008. Pakistan put the Islamist charity, regarded as a front for the Lashkar-e-Taiba group, under monitoring. As Ramadan begins, authorities are cracking down on militant groups who pose as charities but use the money to fund terrorism. [REUTERS/Athar Hussain]

Zakat is an Islamic tradition of donating money during Ramadan to help the needy. Although legitimate charities do remarkable work, militant groups rake in billions of rupees to fund terrorism instead of helping the poor, charity activists say.

However, law enforcement made it much harder for jihadists and fraudulent welfare organisations to raise money in 2011, they agree.

Zakat collection a lucrative business

Because Ramadan emphasizes helping the poor, activists of political and religious parties, including outlawed militant organisations, do whatever they can to maximise the amount they raise, said Faizan Jalil, a Karachi-based journalist who covers terrorism.

They take advantage of the generosity of Pakistani Muslims, who annually contribute billions of rupees as part of zakat and fitrana, donations of food at the end of Ramadan, Jalil told Central Asia Online, citing various reports.

Naive Pakistanis unwittingly donate to terrorist fronts in the name of Islam and humanity, Shah Wali, an aid worker helping flood victims in Badin District, said, stressing the need to raise public awareness.

Every citizen should demand the credentials of the person seeking a donation before giving him or her money, Wali told Central Asia Online. Doing so will thwart phony organisations from receiving money and defaming Islam, he said.

Banned jihadi charities working with new names

Banned militant organisations linked with the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and al-Qaeda pose as charities, said Raees Ahmed, a security analyst who closely monitors jihadi organisations. During Ramadan, banners and posters appealing for zakat collection appear in different parts of the country, he told Central Asia Online.

Last year, after imposing restrictions on charities linked with banned militant organisations, Pakistani authorities thwarted much of their Ramadan fund-raising.

However, the recently formed Difah-e-Pakistan Council (DPC), an alliance of religious parties, has opened new vistas for banned militant organisations.

The Maulana Fazlur Rehman Khalil-led Harkat-ul-Mujahedeen (HuM) and Maulana Abdullah Shah Mazhar-led Jammat-ul-Furqan (JuF), banned militant outfits linked to the TTP and al-Qaeda, have started working under the new names Ansar-ul-Umma and Tehreek-e-Ghalba Islam, Ahmed said, adding they are active under the DPC.

Militants fighting in Kashmir and Afghanistan are brazenly raising funds and recruiting potential fighters throughout Pakistan, the daily Express Tribune reported July 9.

Al-Badr Mujahedeen, a breakaway faction of the Hizb ul-Mujahedeen group, organised a two-day “Shuada Conference” July 8 in the Swan Adda area of Rawalpindi to seek recruits and raise funds, the report said, adding that the faction’s supporters from Punjab, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Pakistani-controlled Jammu and Kashmir attended the conference.

Most banned outfits have many covers for their operations and the first response to a ban is to start operating under a new name, said Muhammad Amir Rana, director of the Pak Institute for Peace Studies (PIPS), an Islamabad-based think tank.

“Changed names of charities also mask their links with militant organisations,” Rana said. “The proscribed JeM (Jaish-e-Muhammad) becomes active as Tehreek-e-Khuddam-ul-Islam, while collecting funds and campaigning as Al Rehmat Trust, the charity wing of the organisation. Similarly, Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) renamed itself Jamaat-ud-Dawa (JuD) and is carrying out its activities as Tehreek-e-Hurmat-e-Rasool, while Falah-e-Insaniyat Foundation oversees the group’s charitable projects and fund-raising.”

The long-standing ban has rattled the network of the Al-Rasheed Trust (ART) and Al-Akhter Trust (AAT), charities linked to TTP, JeM, HuM, al-Qaeda and the Afghan Taliban. In February 2007, the Interior Ministry banned the ART and AAT, sealed their offices nationwide and froze their assets. Authorities also blocked an attempt by the ART to continue working under the name Al-Amin Welfare Trust.

Still, legitimate organisations continue to complain that terrorists are misusing Ramadan to raise funds for subversion.

Government takes action

This year, the government is planning again to order law enforcement agencies to block banned militant groups from raising money during Ramadan, Central Asia Online has learned.

In August, the Sindh and Punjab governments cracked down on 25 and 22 banned organisations, respectively, ordering them to shut down or to stop seeking donations.

Among those on the list are:

  • TTP
  • al-Qaeda
  • HuM
  • JuF
  • JeM
  • Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan
  • Lashkar-e- Jhangvi
  • Tehreek-e-Nafaz- e-Shariat Muhammadi
  • Hizb ut-Tahrir
  • LeT

“So far we didn’t receive any special directive in this regard, but authorities are updating the list of banned organisations involved in spreading militancy and carrying out subversive activities,” said Abdul Rasheed, a senior police official in Karachi’s west region.

Law enforcement agencies will monitor the activities of banned extremist outfits and stop them from Ramadan fund-raising, as they did in 2011, said Rasheed.

Political parties including the Muttahida Qaumi Movement, Awami National Party and Jamaat-e-Islami, through their respective charity fronts, the Khidmat Khalq Foundation, Bacha Khan Welfare Trust and Al-Khidmat Foundation, also raise funds but are not linked to any extremism, he added.

A public awareness campaign, especially during Ramadan, is necessary because most Pakistanis do not know whether various charities are legitimate, he said.

SOURCE: http://centralasiaonline.com/en_GB/articles/caii/features/pakistan/main/2012/07/20/feature-01

 

Visit me on facebook: http://www.facebook.com/ameerahmadmirza

Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/ameermirza2

Myanmar Muslims Always Faithful to Islam

July 24, 2012 Leave a comment
 
Myanmar’s Muslims who reside in the Rakhine State have always remained faithful to their religious identity and that has challenged the Buddhist leaders of Myanmar who have adopted an American identity, a political analyst said. 
 Myanmar Muslims Always Faithful to Islam

(Ahlul Bayt News Agency) – French political analyst and professor emeritus of University of Toulouse Pierre Dortiguier said Muslims in Myanmar have maintained their identity and protect their religion like a lasting heritage, adding that it has apprehended the Buddhist leaders of the country who have replaced their religious identity with an American identity.

“That is why they have supported or at least remained silent over the killing of Muslims in the country.”

He said Buddhist leaders work as American propagators and, like their masters, can not see the power of Islam and Muslims in the world.

Asked about the reason behind the silence of Arab countries over the massacre of Muslims in Myanmar, Dortiguier said Arab states have always had a contradictory political behavior. “It is not the first time these countries and the Arab League remain silent over the killing of Muslims. In fact, they lack geopolitical knowledge.”

He said Arab countries try to avoid anything that might bring about the resentment of the US and Britain.

Pointing to the US policies vis-à-vis Muslim countries, the political analyst said, “American leaders’ policy is that any country or group that acts against Washington’s views should be undermined or sidelined politically. But Muslims, by following the teachings of the Quran, have learned that they should stand up against oppression, injustice and colonialism and it is this resistance that has angered the arrogant powers.”

He said these powers have failed to weaken Muslims and are now trying to take ‘Western Islam’ to Islamic and Arab countries in order to change Muslims’ identity gradually. “When his policy also fails, they adopt the policy of silence and news boycott of the massacre of Muslims.”

Dortiguier noted that Western countries misuse the lack of democracy in Mynamar to impose their policies on the country. “For years, Western powers have made a lot of hype in political circles about lack of democracy in Myanmar.”

He referred to Britain’s support for opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi as an example of this, adding that Suu Kyi has always enjoyed the support of the British embassy in Myanmar without doing anything practical for her country.

Professor emeritus of University of Toulouse further criticized the stance of Buddhists over the killing of Muslims, saying that Buddhism advocates peace and Muslims and Buddhists peacefully coexists in many Asian countries. “However, what we are witnessing in Myanmar today is the result of Buddhist leaders’ mistake and their following of US policies.”

SOURCE:  http://abna.ir/data.asp?lang=3&Id=331246

Visit me on facebook: http://www.facebook.com/ameerahmadmirza

Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/ameermirza2

%d bloggers like this: